Re: [OPE-L] The HM [Haunted and Mysterious] Conference

From: Andrew Brown (A.Brown@LUBS.LEEDS.AC.UK)
Date: Thu Oct 27 2005 - 06:41:04 EDT

• Next message: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
• Previous message: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] The HM [Haunted and Mysterious] Conference"
• Maybe in reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The HM [Haunted and Mysterious] Conference"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Clarification. I wrote:

"So can value. Unlike the fictitious ghost, moreover, value *has* to
reflect itself in corporeality. That is, value has really to overcome
the contradiction that it is immediately non-sensuous if it is to gain
ontological status at all. This is why essence must appear. It is why
essence (value) can only appear by mediation (ultimately via price).
Patrick Murray offers by far and away the best exposition of this point
that I know of (but then makes all the conclusions about magnitudes)"

Value has to reflect itself in the corporeal world.

Murray makes all the *wrong* conclusions about magnitude.

Andy

• Next message: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
• Previous message: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] The HM [Haunted and Mysterious] Conference"
• Maybe in reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The HM [Haunted and Mysterious] Conference"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 00:00:04 EDT