Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value

From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 09:17:28 EST

Next message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts"
Previous message: A.B.Trigg: "Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value"
In reply to: A.B.Trigg: "Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Surplus value describes, in my view,
> specifically a *monetised* form of (part of) the surplus product, an
> objectified value relation

Hi Jurriaan:

I understand your position but I would say that the monetarization
of (part of) the surplus product represents a necessary but not
sufficient condition for the constitution of surplus value.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts"
Previous message: A.B.Trigg: "Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value"
In reply to: A.B.Trigg: "Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan] Surplus value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 03 2005 - 00:00:00 EST