From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Tue Apr 25 2006 - 00:10:00 EDT
> Again Neocleous' point is that he was the first to underline > that the vampire metaphor is meant to illuminate how > capital is undead to the extent its appropriation of sensuous labor > is successful. > You did not write about Capital as the undead for the reason > Neocleous specifies.! Rakesh, No, I don't think I did. You must be confusing what I wrote with what Andy B wrote. > Again the OPE-L discussion in the Fall of 2005 seems to have > appropriated Neocleous' interpretation without acknowledgement. Who "appropriated" Neocleous's interpretation? In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 30 2006 - 00:00:07 EDT