Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'

From: ajit sinha (sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Fri Oct 13 2006 - 05:45:56 EDT

Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] Muhammad Yunus and the secret of original accumulation"
Previous message: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
Next in thread: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
Reply: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

--- Ian Wright <wrighti@ACM.ORG> wrote:

> > Simple, capital cannot be measured by direct and
> > indirect labor-time. Cheers, ajit sinha
>
> Yet it can. ;)
>
> Your and Sraffa's statement is based on a
> labour-cost accounting error.
>
> -Ian.
________________
I'm surprised that you are still not convinced after
our last exchange! ajit
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] Muhammad Yunus and the secret of original accumulation"
Previous message: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
Next in thread: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
Reply: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx on the 'maximum rate of profit'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 31 2006 - 00:00:03 EST