From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Thu Nov 23 2006 - 11:12:42 EST
> Allright then Jerry. We will have to think dialectically about it. In the > literature on the topic, this question is answered basically in terms of > type and scope. > > 1) What are we fighting/competing/struggling about? > 2) What is the scope of that conflict? Jurriaan: The point I was trying to make was the following: in a 'socialist' (post-capitalist, transitional) society, struggle is an essential part of the dynamic of that society. That struggle can be expressed in various ways: e.g. Preobrazhensky referred to the struggle between the "market principle" and the "law of primitive socialist accumulation". The point that I would make is that a movement _towards_ socialism _requires_ struggle. It will not happen of its own accord. Socialism should not be conceived of as a state of "harmony". I am sceptical of the claim, indeed, that there will be "harmony" even under communism. I suspect that some visions of communism represent romantic and wistful thinking. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 30 2006 - 00:00:06 EST