From: Fred Moseley (fmoseley@MTHOLYOKE.EDU)
Date: Mon Dec 04 2006 - 22:21:45 EST
Jerry, I am sorry, but no, I don't see this as a flame. This is one of the posts that I focused on. It seems to me that R. calls your argument that forms of primitive communism can be found in non-humans to be racist. He claims that there is scholarly backing for this call. I don't agree with R's argument, but it is not totally crazy. I think it can be answered. Why not answer it with additional argument, rather than calling it a flame? Please explain what in this post is a flame. What do others think? Comradely, Fred P.S. jerry, I am sure that you have exercised tremendous restraint in not responding to all of R's provocations, and I appreciate that very much. I just have a hard time defending this as a flame. Quoting Jerry Levy <Gerald_A_Levy@msn.com>: > > > http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive/0611/0204.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 31 2006 - 00:00:04 EST