Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values

From: Diego Guerrero (diego.guerrero@CPS.UCM.ES)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2007 - 15:30:48 EST 

Hi, Jerry, 

 

I agree. And promise to try to do this better.

Cheers,

Diego

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jerry Levy 
  To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU 
  Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 4:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values


  > What do you propose then?

  Hi Diego:

  I propose that one begin by identifying and then ordering all 
  of the levels of abstraction associated with the subject. This
  requires, as a prerequisite, that one has a clear idea of 
  exactly what the subject is that you wish to explain.

  Then fill in that 'outline'  enough so that one is more clear
  which questions/issues are answered at each level of 
  abstraction.

  Then, always being clear which level of abstraction you are
  dealing with, discuss the subject systematically from the
  most abstract to the most concrete necessary level of 
  abstraction.  It might be possible (and, indeed, I think it is 
  permissible) to have an order of exposition which 
  doesn't follow quite the same order provided one has already 
  worked out analytically all of the inter-connections. But,
  for purposes of dialogue, it is less confusing to proceed 
  in the above order.

  In solidarity, Jerry

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 00:00:08 EST