From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Sat Mar 03 2007 - 09:41:12 EST
> > [Prices] are a NECESSARY mode of expression of value because the > > commodity necessary entails an array of SPECIFIC social > > relations which include (amongst other things) the market and > > money. > You've taken a salto mortale yourself here, Jerry: value -> > commodity. This assumes what you're trying to prove. Paul > and I think that "value" is a more general category, socio- > historically, than "commodity". Hi Allin: I think that you've taken a salto mortale yourself by asserting that value is "more general" than commodity and that the former can exist independently of the latter. So, one (or more) of us must have taken a deadly leap. When in human history has value existed when commodity has not? In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 01:00:12 EDT