Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values

From: Pen-L Fred Moseley (fmoseley@MTHOLYOKE.EDU)
Date: Sat Mar 24 2007 - 09:16:54 EDT

Next message: Pen-L Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] _Capital_ and Empire: An Interview with John Bellamy Foster"
In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Quoting Jerry Levy <Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM>:

> Fred
>
> I think that this is the most important advance in Diego's recent work
> - developing Marx's theory beyond Capital to lower levels of
> abstraction, at which the initial given (and unchanging) magnitudes of
> C and V are explained more fully. <<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
> Which work(s)  by Diego are you referring to?
>
> In solidarity, Jerry
>

His recent postings on OPEL and a recent paper that he has circulated
and discussed on OPEL.

Comradely,
Fred



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Next message: Pen-L Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] _Capital_ and Empire: An Interview with John Bellamy Foster"
In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 01:00:12 EDT