Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?,

From: paul cockshott (clyder@GN.APC.ORG)
Date: Mon Mar 26 2007 - 11:28:31 EDT

Next message: ope-admin@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu: "Re: [OPE-L] debate on labor aristocracy"
Previous message: paul cockshott: "[OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] advances and ongoing debates in physics and statistical mechanics?"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?,"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

 
Rakesh
-----------
This equalization of the profit rate does indeed contradict the law
of value, which Marx criticizes Ricardo for covering up!  
 
Paul
------
You speak as if there was an equalisation of profit rates, there is none.

Next message: ope-admin@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu: "Re: [OPE-L] debate on labor aristocracy"
Previous message: paul cockshott: "[OPE-L] Fw: [OPE-L] advances and ongoing debates in physics and statistical mechanics?"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?,"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 01:00:12 EDT