Re: [OPE-L] Question

From: Allin Cottrell (cottrell@WFU.EDU)
Date: Mon Apr 09 2007 - 20:36:59 EDT

Next message: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] The Use-Value & SNLT Question"
Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The Use-Value & SNLT Question"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Question"
Next in thread: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] Question"
Reply: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] Question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Paul Cockshott wrote:

> This usage overloads the word 'need' or 'necessary' with two distinct
> meanings:
>
> 1. necessary under current levels of technology
>
> 2. necessary to meet currently available market demand...

Thanks, Paul.  This is very much the reply I intended to give to
Howard's question, had I had time to do so.

Allin.

Next message: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] The Use-Value & SNLT Question"
Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The Use-Value & SNLT Question"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Question"
Next in thread: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] Question"
Reply: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: [OPE-L] Question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 30 2007 - 00:00:16 EDT