From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2007 - 07:24:37 EDT
> So why would the WB put a 'communications advisor' into State, > regardless of the pay grade and nepotism involved? Hi Patrick: It seems to me that this story is about the arrogance of power associated with capital and the state: i.e. the belief by Wolfowitz that he could do whatever he wanted to do because of the power that he had. Such arrogance -- the belief that they can get away with anything, and are basically not answerable to anyone -- has been a characteristic of the neo-cons since G.W. Bush was anointed President. > What do we learn > about imperialism and the autonomy of the financial wing of the > bourgeoisie's exec. committee? What do you think the lessons are? In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 30 2007 - 00:00:16 EDT