From: Ian Hunt (ian.hunt@FLINDERS.EDU.AU)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2007 - 06:58:14 EDT
Dear Paul I should have added that you can get the value of the special skill by Rubin and Hilferding's method. But the longer time is not just doing the same work slowly, it involves different concrete labours from surgery. The labour of learning takes years rather than just a pause to look up the DIY bricklaying guide. It may be only a quantitative difference but this amounts to the difference between trained labour power and a special skill. Therefore, rather than say that more hours of abstract labour are contained in the concrete labour of surgery, it would be better to say that the skill (as a bit of fixed human capital) imparts its value to the product on top of the labour the surgeon does. If the skills are scarce, there will be rent earned on top. Cheers, Ian > >Ian >--- >I only meant that you cannot get an ordinarily skilled person to do >the work of a surgeon over a longer period of time, as you can get an >ordinarily skilled person to do the work of a bricklayer, though over >a longer period of time >----------- > >Paul >---- >Are surgeons then from a different species? >All trades, that of surgeon included, involve a time acquiring the >skill. >Thus over a longer period of time you can get any person to do it - >provided >that you set aside the time for them to gain the skill. This longer >period >also applies to bricklaying - if it is to be done soundly rather than >making >a botched job of it. The time to aquire some skills is shorter than >others >but there is not a qualitative difference. -- Associate Professor Ian Hunt, Dept of Philosophy, School of Humanities, Director, Centre for Applied Philosophy, Flinders University of SA, Humanities Building, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Ph: (08) 8201 2054 Fax: (08) 8201 2784
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 30 2007 - 00:00:04 EDT