From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Wed Sep 05 2007 - 12:04:22 EDT
<http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive/0709/0030.html> So, we are in agreement on the above? If not, is there anyone on the list who is able to mount a defense of the Kliman / McGlone position on "Marx's Marxism", "The Scorecard" as a way of resolving interpretive disputes, and the thesis that "The economists have only corrected Marx, in various ways; the point is to interpret him ... correctly"? At this point, I believe the onus of proof is on those who believe that dogmatic perspectives have _not_ been advanced by Kliman et al. Although most Marxians came to the conclusion many years ago that Kliman and his supporters have advanced dogmatic propositions, it would represent a step forward if we could all say publicly what just about all of us recognize privately: dogmatism needs to be exposed rather than simply ignored. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 00:00:05 EDT