Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination

From: ajit sinha (sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 06:34:30 EDT

Next message: Dogan Goecmen: "Re: [OPE-L] New essay at artefact: Dialectic of Self and Other"
Previous message: ajit sinha: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
In reply to: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Next in thread: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Reply: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

--- Fred Moseley <fmoseley@MTHOLYOKE.EDU> wrote:

  The fact that Marx’s
> theory cannot be
> translated into a different logical method does not
> imply that Marx’s
> theory is logically invalid.  It only implies that
> Marx’s theory cannot
> be translated into this different logical method,
> without producing
> “anomalies”, etc.
>
> Comradely,
> Fred
__________________
Fred, how many "logical methods" are out there?
Cheers, ajit sinha

____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz h!

Next message: Dogan Goecmen: "Re: [OPE-L] New essay at artefact: Dialectic of Self and Other"
Previous message: ajit sinha: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
In reply to: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Next in thread: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Reply: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 00:00:05 EDT