Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination

From: Ian Wright (wrighti@ACM.ORG)
Date: Wed Sep 19 2007 - 14:35:22 EDT

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Marx and Philosophy seminar:: Roberto Veneziani and G.M. Tamas"
Previous message: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Next in thread: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Just a quick correction:

> PPi(t) = f(PPi(t-1)) + r g(PPi(t-1))

The functions f and g must be functions of not just PPi but
potentially all PPi, where i ranges from 1 to n.

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Marx and Philosophy seminar:: Roberto Veneziani and G.M. Tamas"
Previous message: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Next in thread: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 00:00:05 EDT