From: ajit sinha (sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2007 - 10:30:50 EDT
--- glevy@PRATT.EDU wrote: > > Jerry, you have to give me an argument to argue > with > > you. Names mean nothing to me. > > Hi Ajit: > > In that case, I'll take out the names below. > > >> If wages were decreased and/or the intensity of > work was > >> increased whether the rate of profit would rise, > fall, or stay > >> the same would depend on the *extent* to which > these factors > >> <...> would offset a decline in profitability (if > there were indeed > >> forces at work which exerted pressure on the rate > of profit > >> to decline). > > Why do you think this needs more explanation? _____________________ Because you have given no explanation. "IF there were indeed forces ..." (emphasis added) is no explanation. _______________ > Surely, you must be > able to conceive how within your analytic framework, > there are > circumstances in which the rate of profit can > continue to fall but at a > lesser rate? > > In solidarity, Jerry __________________________ No. You want me to think for you as well as myself. I'm not willing to do that. Cheers, ajit sinha > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:00:15 EDT