Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - does anyone think it is relevant?

From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2007 - 11:35:08 EDT

Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] Marx on the general rate of profit/rate of interest: a translation error"
Previous message: GERALD LEVY: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - do anyone think it is relevant?"
Maybe in reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - does anyone think it is relevant?"
Next in thread: Gary Mongiovi: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - do anyone think it is relevant?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>  And of course it is the monetary rate of profit we are  talking about -
>the only rate
>>that capitalists care about.
>  Individual capitalists care about the rate of return on investment
>(RRI), not the
>  rate of profit per se.  I believe we had that  discussion, though, before
>you
>  joined OPE-L.

Hi Anders:

That discussion took place (primarily) in *May, 1997*:

Here are a couple of posts authored by John E (who has become a 'lurker'
because of
work commitments, etc.):

<http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive/9705/0175.html>
<http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive/9705/0075.html>

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] Marx on the general rate of profit/rate of interest: a translation error"
Previous message: GERALD LEVY: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - do anyone think it is relevant?"
Maybe in reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - does anyone think it is relevant?"
Next in thread: Gary Mongiovi: "Re: [OPE-L] Okishio Theorem - do anyone think it is relevant?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 02 2007 - 00:00:19 EDT