Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital

From: Dave Zachariah (davez@KTH.SE)
Date: Sat Jan 12 2008 - 08:38:15 EST

Next message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Previous message: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

on 2008-01-12 13:50 Jerry Levy wrote:
>> Ok, so what is the unit you would measure the annual flow of
>> *surplus value* in?
>>
>
> Monetary units, Dave.
>
> In solidarity, Jerry
>

Ok, I understand. I thought we were speaking of the average rate of
profit in terms of labour-value. You are measuring s as the monetary
surplus value or "gross profits".

//Dave Z

Next message: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Previous message: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST