Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox

From: clyder@GN.APC.ORG
Date: Sat Jan 12 2008 - 10:26:03 EST

Next message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Previous message: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
In reply to: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

 > I do not know what Paul Cockshott means by "actual money capital", and how
> this differs from money-of-account.
>



Krugerrands

Next message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Previous message: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
In reply to: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] The lump of surplus value fallacy and the Moseley paradox"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST