From: glevy@pratt.edu
Date: Tue Mar 18 2008 - 10:20:02 EDT
Hi Dave Z: Thanks for the reply. > Part of the answers depend on what one considers to be a crisis. > Clearly, a 10% unemployment rate is a crisis for the working class but > the firms and rentiers may be doing fine. OK. > The severity of a crisis could be measured by the fraction of capital > (e.g. of the total fixed capital) making a loss. Thus the evolution of > the distribution of profit rates ought to be one good indicator of the > state of the economy. Starting with the assumptions of the labour theory > of value one can show that the long-run movements of this distribution > is ultimately constrained by population growth, productivity growth and > the fraction of profits reinvested. Well, that relates to - as you say - "long-run movements". The questions at hand in an economic crisis are generally short-run: i.e. how long will a particular crisis last and how bad (for different classes and groups) will it get? I think you need to look at other variables to explain the short- to medium-run changes. > Moreover, a monetary system, which enables the operations of a > capitalist economy in the first place, depends on the creation of credit > and debt. Therefore the inability to pay debts should be another > indicator. True enough, but the state and the central bank can have short- to medium-term impacts on the levels of credit and debt. In solidarity, Jerry _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2008 - 00:00:15 EDT