From: dogangoecmen@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 04 2008 - 06:36:41 EDT
Dave Z ? "Dogan, you are missing the point here. Marx's deduction of the genesis of money, whether based on dialectical logic or not, does not hold up to the empirical evidence. Money did not arise from simple commodity production. The fact that one deduces things using empirical categories does not mean that they hold empirically." ??? ??? ??? Well, how do you explain then the genesis of money. I hear from you solely that Marx's explanation does not work, ??? ??? ??? that it does not hold to the empirical evidences. So, what is your explanation of the genesis? of money? ? "Science is the construction of parsimonious, internally consistent models that can reliably predict observations. No amount of dialectical logic can alter this criterion. " ??? ?? ?? Do you mean by construction apriori or aaposteriori constructions? do you mean that dialectical logic is denying predictions? Dogan ? ________________________________________________________________________ Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail f?r alle. Klicken Sie auf AOL.de um heraus zu finden, was es sonst noch kostenlos bei AOL gibt. _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT