From: GERALD LEVY (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Sat Aug 23 2008 - 08:51:32 EDT
> It has yet to find an effective form of> political organization based on the principle of "unite the many to> defeat the few" which can manage differences of opinion without the> endless splitting and rivalries. Hi Dave: Yes, but there are alternative models: for example, a confederation of autonomous organizations and affinity groups. The Algerian revolution relied heavily on such a model. Most often a relatively decentralized leadership structure - with, in some cases, layers of leadership - have developed in response to state repression (e.g. the Hungarian Communist Party in 1918 had at least 4 central committees so that in the event that the members of the CC were arrested then the 2nd CC would become the leadership,etc.) There have been lots of differences in perspective in the EZLN in Chiapas but there haven't been endless splits. Maybe we should ask why? > You can certainly have brief periods of riots or even upheavals but> not much progressive change can result from growing discontent and> unrest unless there are organizations already in place that can grow> into political forces of action. That, at least, is a lesson from US> history. Perhaps, but is it the experience in all other capitalist social formations? I don't think so. There have been examples historically (e.g. Hungary in 1918) when the masses made a revolution without the support of any of the major political parties. Indeed, in that case the leadership of the communist, social democratic, and radical parties all argued that a revolution would be premature and doomed to failure. Independent working-class organizations made a revolution anyway and then presented them with a fait accompli. This makes very good reading, but I can't recall the exact source at the moment (maybe Oskar Jazni?). Basically, the leadership of popular and radical organizations (including Michael Karolyi) hid in a room fully expecting that at any moment the state troops would barge into the room and kill them all. Instead, revolutionaries broke down the door and told the shivering radicals that they should form a government and applauded Karolyi as president! Evidently, it didn't occur to them that there should be some form of direct democracy. In solidarity, Jerry _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 00:00:07 EDT