> If a socialist economy has reached the stage where it can be concerned > about such things, which is only after initial industrialisation,> then what should be done is fix labour budgets for units of production. > If a unit of production making good A is producing efficiently and > another also making A> inefficiently, then the labour budget of the efficient unit should be > increased to expand production there and the labour budget> of the less efficient one correspondingly reduced. In effect labour is > transfered to the more efficient unit. The collective in> the inefficient unit then has an incentive to improve their utilisation > of resources to keep their work teams together come the> next plan period.
Hi Paul C:
Assume that one 'unit of production' producing good A is more
efficient than another unit of production producing good A due
to more advanced technologies being utilized in the former. The
system that you outline above would reward the collective which
is more efficient and punish the one which is relatively inefficient
for no other reason than, perhaps, the former inherited a more
efficient array of plant and equipment at the time of the revolution.
It hardly seems fair to me to punish the workers in the second
collective for decisions made previously by their bourgeois
management.
We must avoid a 'cult of efficiency', imo, on socialist ethical grounds.
This question has important political ramifications if it were,
especially, placed within the context of an international socialist
division of labor.
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Nov 4 10:34:33 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:07:39 EST