> In brief, Marx never argued at all that "that for a commodity to represent value it must have use-value and exchange-value".
OK, Jurriaan, I can't resist another small bite:
True, he argued that exchange-value is a ***necessary form of appearance*** of value.
If you don't like the phrasing above, then it can be re-phrased as follows:
for a commodity to represent value it must have use-value and its value
must come to be expressed through the value-form."
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Dec 10 10:22:40 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2008 - 00:00:05 EST