> Well, then there is really not a substantive difference on issue between us here, just a matter of
> terminology, especially since you agree --- following Rubin --- that even a socialist economy will
> have to economize with its 'socially equalized labour'.
Dave Z:
Well, I don't know whether there is agreement or not. The issue here, from my perspective, is the
*specific form* through which there will be socially equalized labour under socialism. There must
be qualitatively and historically distinct forms through which this happens under socialism from
the form it arises under capitalism. This is obviously related to the question (to put it in
the most simple way): what are the ways in which socialism will be similar to and different from
other modes of production?
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Feb 18 10:24:40 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 24 2009 - 20:30:37 EDT