> Again, you have not addressed the problem of measuring the stock of net
> wage costs.
Dave:
Again, you have to deal with the conceptual issues first.
> Wage costs would be more relevant when measuring the flow rate of
> profit, not the rate of return on productive assets.
Then, why not measure the "flow rate of profit"?
>> Tell that to Shaikh and Tonak, for them it is relevant to consider an
> upper bound, I'm not directly considering that: R = P/K.
As I recall (and my memory could be incorrect, of course), the 'maximum
rate of profit' was not a concept which was operationalized in their
empirical studies.
In solidarity, Jerry_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sun May 17 12:29:30 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 31 2009 - 00:00:03 EDT