Re: [OPE] Science and scientology

You miss my point, Jerry. Why do you presume I presume? I have some
experience learning about the world I engage and draw conclusions from it.
No matter. It is the rhetorical style of the list. Have a great voyage!

howard

howard engelskirchen
he31@verizon.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "GERALD LEVY" <gerald_a_levy@msn.com>
To: "Outline on Political Economy mailing list" <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: [OPE] Science and scientology

If you look at *any* source presuming that it will shed enormous light
on a subject of great concern, then the likelihood will be that you
will find what you are looking for. This, however, is not a scientific
method of investigation.

In solidarity, Jerry

> "It's a
> history of thought question which, by itself, doesn't shed any light
> on the actual scientific subject."
> This is a very useful distinction, and one that clarifies the importance
> of
> accurately understanding Marx. He still manages to shed enormous light on
> actual scientific subjects of immense
> concern._______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Mon Jun 8 15:22:40 2009