Re: [OPE] Are Regulation Theorists Marxists?

 Dave,
thank you for the reference.
It is a very useful reading ideed.

D.Göçmen
http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Zachariah <davez@kth.se>
To: wrighti@acm.org; Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Sent: Wed, Aug 19, 2009 8:12 pm
Subject: Re: [OPE] Are Regulation Theorists Marxists?

Ian Wright wrote: 

> I can't answer your specific question, since I have yet to read 

> anything by the regulation school. But I'd argue that a litmus test 

> for a body of economic work to be classified as Marxist is acceptance 

> of the labor theory of value. This may seem blindingly obvious [...] 

>  

I think this is incorrect. There are Marxist economists that either do
not bother about the labour theory of value or have abandoned it. For
instance, Robert Brenner or Prabhat Patnaik. 
 

Of course, rigid classifications are futile here. But I'd say in general
that Marxism is a political philosophy that entails two things:
subscribing to a materialist concept of history and applying this
analysis in political advancement for the benefit of the oppressed. 
 

I haven't read sufficient material by the regulation theorists. But from
what I can recall from Brenner and Glick's article on the topic is that
this school has a historical-materialist framework although they are not
necessarily Marxists. 
 

See: 
 

  Robert Brenner
 and Mark Glick 

  New Left Review I/188, July-August 1991 

  <http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=1643> 
 

//Dave Z 

_______________________________________________ 

ope mailing list 

ope@lists.csuchico.edu 

https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope%c2 

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Aug 21 08:09:49 2009