> Entrepreneurial uncertainty, which is the basis of disequilibrium prices, is
> the crux of real market economies, and it is subjected to countless
> additional conditional assumptions that make its mathematical treatment
> fruitless. Unless labor value theorists stop to think in terms of labor
> determined prices driven by natural price equilibrium, they won’t be able to
> introduce any dynamic proviso to their account of capitalism. Unfortunately
> for them, this change would be devastating for the integrity of the
> transformation thesis.
Why are aggregate market prices highly correlated to labor-values?
What do you think economic value actually is? More precisely, what, in
your view, does 1$ represent?
Thanks,
-Ian.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Sep 15 13:06:21 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EDT