How else would you know that
there was disequilibrium unless you had an equilibrium
reference point?Â
Jerry,
you show yourself from your best dialectician side.
Well done :-)
D.Göçmen
http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Levy <jerry_levy@verizon.net>
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Sent: Wed, Sep 16, 2009 10:26 pm
Subject: Re: [OPE] Specially for Patrick Bond: David Harvey on equilibrium
> In this way, Harvey joins in the chorus of the equilibrium Marxists. Â
Jurriaan:Â
Â
You might as well add all of those Marxists to theÂ
chorus who have a concept of disequilibrium dynamicsÂ
since you can't have a theory of disequilibrium without aÂ
theory of equilibrium. How else would you know that
there was disequilibrium unless you had an equilibrium
reference point?Â
Â
In solidarity, JerryÂ
_______________________________________________Â
ope mailing listÂ
ope@lists.csuchico.eduÂ
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope%c2
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Sep 16 15:36:58 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EDT