> What's wrong with easy, Paul? It is preferable to difficult or downright
> impossible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Phil (and Paul Z):
Easy is one thing, but Paul Z said _too_ easy.
In solidarity, Jerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Easy way out, Phil, too easy. Paul
>> Philip Dunn wrote:
>> > Choosing 100%, just dropping the whole idea of unproductive
>> > labour, avoids issues that cannot be settled either theoretically or
>> > empirically.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sat Oct 17 20:26:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 31 2009 - 00:00:02 EDT