Yes, broadly I agree with Paul A on this, especially his point that 
knowledge resources are impossible to value 'because they are not used up by 
being used'. Knowledge, then, is not alienable, and therefore IMO not a 
commodity.
The special legal category of 'intellectual property' should alert us that 
there is something different about knowledge - the factory worker does not 
have any property rights over the commodities he makes; the factory owner 
does not have any property rights over the future use of the commodities he 
sells.
Another funny thing about knowledge is that the consumer often plays an 
active role in its production. For example, the reader brings his own 
interpretation and experiences to his reading, hence the reader also 
'produces' the novel.  This is not a trait of value, but of use-value (the 
use-value of a car, say, depends not only on the useful labor embodied in it 
but also on how and why you want to drive it).
Paula 
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Nov 11 19:47:28 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EST