Reuters has some informative articles on the food crisis:
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/11/24/a-paradox-of-plenty-hunger-in-america/
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5A909H20091110
http://blogs.reuters.com/route-to-recovery/tag/food-bank/
http://blogs.reuters.com/commodity-corner/2009/11/12/michael-pollan-whats-in-the-beef/
Never in world history has the Lord's Prayer had such an actuality: "give us 
today our daily bread". More than prayers is obviously necessary, however.
The most spectacular thing about modern capitalism is that, despite endless 
odes to equilibrium theory and wondrous technologies, it fails to provide 
more than a billion people with an adequate supply of the most basic 
requirements of human life: food, proper sanitation and clean drinking 
water. Of course, that argument easily gets turned around: the reason for 
this lack, it is argued, is that "there is not enough capitalism". That 
argument is not all that convincing however, since "risk-averse" market 
economies, obsessed with shortterm profit, fail to invest even the minimum 
amount necessary in these areas. But that means a massive and indeed lethal 
risk for hundreds of millions of people. Could it be, that previous "risk 
management" philosophies have in reality been highly biased in their risk 
assessment?
Risk for whom? Risk of what? Those is the questions one ought to ask.
J. 
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Nov 24 17:46:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EST