> A historical-materialist analysis must necessarily distinguish between (a)
> the territorial state,
> (b) the population that lives within that territory and (c) the
> representation of a *part* of the
> population on the ideological plane as an imagined community, i.e. the
> nation.
> In my view too many socialists have failed to make this distinction,
> collapsing all three concepts
> into one: 'the nation', e.g. 'USA', 'Americans', 'India', 'Indians' and so
> on, thereby accepting
> nationalist mythology.
Hi Dave Z:
This is one-sided, I think. A nation is not an "imagined community". It is
a real, but
stratified, community. A materialist analysis can not begin with a rejection
of
material realities: it must seek to explain in part the _complex_ relation
between material
realities and ideology. If nations were simply myths they would have
vanished long
ago (?).
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Dec 18 08:32:35 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 31 2009 - 00:00:02 EST