Re: [OPE] 'conspiracy theory'

Dave,

You apparently have Cockburn and Escobar in your highest esteem.

1. Cockburn does attempt to place every person researching 9/11 in the
same ball of toxic wax, yet he sometimes forgets: "Then it was
McKinney's turn. A terrific liberal black congresswoman. Like Hilliard
she wasn't cowed by the Israel right-or-wrong lobby and called for real
debate on the Middle East. And she called for a real examination of the
lead-up to 9/11. So the sky fell in on her." Counterpunch, 8/21/02
(McKinney's position today is even more forcible than at that time.)

2. You send me to Pepe Escobar's 8/30/01 article. I send you to his
4/8/04 article about the '9/11 Commission Report' which interfaces,
particularly in the Conclusion, with questions which have motivated my
own search for greater understanding:
 
* 9-11 AND THE SMOKING GUN*
  www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/FD08Aa01.html

Paul Z.

=====
(V23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11, Seven Stories Press softcover, 2008 2nd ed
(V24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA .... (V25) WHY CAPITALISM SURVIVES CRISES
====> Research in Political Economy, Emerald Group, Bingley, UK
====> Paul Zarembka, Editor www.buffalo.edu/~zarembka
.

Dave Zachariah wrote:

...
> Until then I will take Pepe Escobar's piece in Asia Times from August
> 30th 2001 as an example of those who took these historical processes
> seriously:
>
> <http://www.atimes.com/ind-pak/CH30Df01.html>
>
> //Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Fri Jan 1 22:01:20 2010