>I agree with what you say below, which is why it is not clear that one can
>count
> workers savings as part of V.
Hi Paul C:
What's the alternative - treating V in a Lassallian sense (the Iron Law of
Wages)
as the money required to reproduce the working class at a strict, physical,
minimum
level irrespective of spatial and temporal (including cultural and 'moral')
considerations? Surely, V must not only include an amount sufficient for
the subsistence
of workers today but their continued reproduction - and that, in many
cultual contexts-
requires workers' savings.
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Apr 8 10:56:07 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2010 - 00:00:02 EDT