Since the ussr was at an above average economic level, the spread of revolution meant, at least in medium term , higher aid bills.
--- original message ---
From: "GERALD LEVY" <gerald_a_levy@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [OPE] socialist planning in capitalist firms
Date: 10th June 2010
Time: 2:42:32 pm
> So again, the qualitative inputs provided by returns to management are essential to asses the
> opportunity costs of centrally planned socialism.
Hi Alejandro:
This could be cited as a rationalization for a bureaucratic managerial elite.
Yet, it was the presence of a bureaucracy itself that accounted for most of the
inefficiencies and inequalities associated with what you call 'centrally planned
socialism'. As for the opportunity costs, this was fundamentally a reflection
of the scarcity caused by the isolation of these economies. The way to overcome
this problem - something that Lenin and the majority of the 'old Bolsheviks'
were very clear about - would have been global socialism.
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Jun 10 14:43:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 30 2010 - 00:00:03 EDT