Surely howard is saying that a relationship is non-dialectical if there is no feedback.
________________________________________
From: ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu [ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Zachariah [davez@kth.se]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:44 PM
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
Subject: Re: [OPE] The state under capitalism
Hi
Howard,
On
2010-08-19
14:48, you
wrote:
> In the
> context
> of
> Paul's
> comment,
> non-dialectical
> would be
> a kind
> of
> technological
> or
> productive
> forces
> determinism
> where
> the
> superstructure
> never
> influenced
> the
> base.
Ok, so
here a
'non-dialectical
relationship'
means that
the
variation
in the
properties
of one of
the
elements
in a
relation
is fully
accounted
by the
properties
of the
other
element
but not
the other
way
around.
Note that
this
includes
relationships
that are
non-linear
and
possibly
historically
evolved,
which
includes
Jerry's
notion of
'non-dialectical
relationships'.
How do you
account
for this?
//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Aug 19 17:46:48 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 31 2010 - 00:00:02 EDT