Re: [OPE] Call for Paers: [MARXISM 21] special issue

From: Paul Cockshott <wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
Date: Wed Sep 08 2010 - 16:15:16 EDT

But what about the question it raises about point about policies inspired by the theory of ecploitation.?
Also what about econometric data on exploitation?
Both would fit the call.

--- original message ---
From: "Dave Zachariah" <davez@kth.se>
Subject: Re: [OPE] Call for Paers: [MARXISM 21] special issue
Date: 8th September 2010
Time: 8:41:32 pm

 On 2010-09-08 01:26, rieudm@cnu.ac.kr wrote:
>
>
> *Call for Papers: Special Issue on Reconstructing/Reinterpreting
> Marxian Theory of Exploitation.*
>
> [...]
>
> /MARXISM 21/ invites submissions for a special issue on
> *_Reconstructing (or Reinterpreting) Marxian Theory of Exploitation_*.
> Contributions are invited on topics including, but not limited to, the
> following:
>
> ¡¤ Mathematical reformulations of Marxian theory of exploitation
>
> ¡¤ Philosophical and sociological conceptualization of Marxian concept
> of exploitation
>
> ¡¤ Policy proposal based upon Marxian theory of exploitation (e.g.
> basic income)
>
> ¡¤ Questions of applying Marxian theory of exploitation for the recent
> change in capitalism including the advent of the so-called
> ¡®information revolution¡¯.
>
>

Frankly, I can't see what needs to be 'reconstructed' or 'reinterpreted'
about the Marxian theory of exploitation? I think it has been pretty
clear and succinctly formulated by several generations of Marxists as
the appropriation of a surplus product.

//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Sep 8 16:17:23 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 30 2010 - 00:00:01 EDT