Re: [OPE] Question about books that are sound introductions to economics

From: Paul Cockshott <wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
Date: Tue Sep 21 2010 - 10:46:22 EDT

Well if there is no obvious difference in two peoples productivity the parsimonious assumption must be that their productivity is the same, so I don't see that there really any problem here.

-----Original Message-----
From: ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu [mailto:ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu] On Behalf Of GERALD LEVY
Sent: 21 September 2010 01:59
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
Subject: Re: [OPE] Question about books that are sound introductions to economics

> I dispute what you say about there being no objective calculus for comparing trained and untrained labour. Skilled versus
> unskilled in a given trade can obviously be compared by looking at differences in productivity per day.

Hi Paul C:

Calculating and then comparing productivity is not so 'obvious'.

In solidarity, Jerry

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Sep 21 10:47:53 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 30 2010 - 00:00:01 EDT