Re: [OPE] Reply to critics

Hi Dave Z:
 
Then 'increase resolution' some more and employ 'n'-many branches of
production.
 
Or, consider the matter in relation to the transformation of values
into prices of production where you see the mobility of s which arises
because of the mobility of money capital.
 
In solidarity, Jerry
 
 
 
 
 
 
> If we treat 'luxuries' as simply part of Dept. II (means of consumption)
> then why would any of the rest follow?
>
>
> This misses the point completely.
>
> The point was that once you partition the economic system in this way
> you realize that certain properties relevant to the questions of
> productive/unproductive labour were not apparent in Marx's lower
> resolution model. Once you increase resolution you can see them.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Oct 20 09:08:17 2010