Here is an interesting note by one of India's leading Marxist economists:
Notes on Contemporary Imperialism
Prabhat Patnaik
http://pragoti.org/node/4234
His critique of Hardt/Negri-style arguments is very good. A few points
that I found problematic:
1. The orthodox idea that 'fascism is promoted by finance capital'
has as a general theory very little backing. It is a serious
misconception of fascist movements.
2. Patnaik's correctly identifies structural obstacles for
coordinated cross-national labour movements between high- and
low-wage countries. But his alternative of 'de-linking' national
economies from the capitalist world economy would probably have
even less prospects. What is the viability of the national
economies of Greece, France, Ireland or United Kingdom at current
living standards of the working people? Perhaps economies of the
size of India or China could do it, but not those of South America
and Europe; there cross-national 'Bolivarian'-style strategy has
greater prospects.
3. In developing economies, Patnaik urges for an alliance of
wage-workers and peasants led by the labour movement that can
advance an alternative economic trajectory. He should have
addressed the potential contradictions inherent to such a 'bloc'.
The basic point is that a progressive trajectory would require
development of the productive forces and that becomes increasingly
incompatible with small-scale peasant holdings. In other words,
what is the industrial policy that would simultaneously benefit
the working-class and peasantry? The development in West Bengal in
recent years indicates that the socialist movement in India has
yet to find it.
//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sat Dec 25 08:37:17 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 31 2010 - 00:00:02 EST