Re: [OPE] Marx's explanation regarding the need for the U.S. South to obtain new territory

From: Paul Zarembka <zarembka@buffalo.edu>
Date: Tue Feb 15 2011 - 20:30:34 EST

What is the primary point?

I do grant that "to much of" leaves some space for some of the
territorial land usuable for slave-based production.

Paul Z.

On 2/15/2011 6:29 PM, paul bullock wrote:
>
> You miss out the 'to much of'... which leaves limited room for
> Marx's point to stand.
>
> In any case it is a secondary point.
>
> PB.
>
> *From:* ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu
> [mailto:ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu] *On Behalf Of *Paul Zarembka
> *Sent:* 15 February 2011 17:34
> *To:* Outline on Political Economy
> *Subject:* [OPE] Marx's explanation regarding the need for the U.S.
> South to obtain new territory
>
> Marx wrote that the deteriorating soil resulting from the crops being
> grown in the U.S. South led to the need for slave masters to expand
> onto new land. There are two pillars of such a view: 1. the soil was
> truly deteriorating, and 2. the movement into new territories would
> resolve the economic problem.
>
> Regarding the second point, I cite the following:
>
> "Since slavery was unadaptable to much of the territorial lands, which
> eventually would be admitted as free states, the South became more
> anxious about maintaining its position as an equal in the Union.
> Southerners thus strongly supported the annexation of Texas (certain
> to be a slave state) and the Mexican War and even agitated for the
> annexation of Cuba." (www.us-civilwar.com <http://www.us-civilwar.com>)
>
> In other words, it is stated above the Marx is wrong that slavery
> could be incorporated into the new lands (it was 'unadaptable' thereto).
>
> If he is wrong on this point, then Marx was incorrect in his
> explanation for the expansion drive of slave masters. Slavery becomes
> disconnected from that economic basis Marx presented.
>
> Comments?
>
> Paul Z.
>
> --
> =====
> (V23) HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11, Seven Stories Press, 2nd ed. softcover
> (V24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA (V25) WHY CAPITALISM SURVIVES CRISES
> (V26) THE NATIONAL QUESTION AND THE QUESTION OF CRISIS
> ====> Research in Political Economy, Emerald Group, Bingley, UK
> ====> P.Zarembka, ed.,www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?issn=0161-7230 <http://www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?issn=0161-7230>
> ====> orwww.buffalo.edu/~zarembka <http://www.buffalo.edu/%7Ezarembka>
> .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ope mailing list
> ope@lists.csuchico.edu
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
>

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Feb 15 20:31:47 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 28 2011 - 00:00:02 EST