Well, Lenin argues that there is a fusion of bank capital with large-scale industry, this gives rise to a financial oligarchy, and this oligarchy dominates the capitalist economy (and indeed politics) - a sort of monolithic or monumental domination.
Certainly, there does exist a financial oligarchy, but it doesn't have the sort of absolute power ascribed to it by Leninists. In fact, as I pointed out long ago, the more that the ownership, control, management and use of capital assets are separated, the more problematic the "rule of capital" in fact becomes.
J.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paula
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OPE] fascism / opposing imperialist military interventioninLibya
Jurriaan wrote:
“I understand Lenin to be claiming the omnipotence of (large) banks RELATIVE TO other industries or sectors of capitalist activity”.
You profoundly misunderstand him, then.
Paula
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Apr 13 18:28:20 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 30 2011 - 00:00:03 EDT