Paul,
If it is not wrong on my part to take out a sentence like this from your
comments, you said:
"and this is
only to be discussed, by the working class itself,� as they create such
societies."
I would like to know who constitute 'working class'? Are we�[those who are
engaged in mental occupations of teaching, research or some such activity] not
part of working class, though the upper stratum of it?
I hope�you won't misunderstand me that I�am diverting the�debate.
Bapuji
�
B.R.Bapuji, Professor,
Centre for Applied Linguistics & Translation Studies [CALTS],
University of Hyderabad, Central University post office,
HYDERABAD-500 046. (Phone: 040-23133655,23133650 or 23010161).
Residence address:
76, Lake-side Colony, Near Durgam Cheruvu,�[End of Road opp:Madapur Police
Station], Jubilee Hills post, Hyderabad-500033.
(Phone: 040-23117302)
�
________________________________
From: Paul Bullock <paulbullock@ebms-ltd.co.uk>
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 9:40:44 PM
Subject: Re: [OPE] market - and other kinds of - socialism
The point to remember is that capitalist societies will have a common
structure of exploitation and reproduction. Socialist societies that are
this able to run the show , ratehr than having the show run them, will
show a very great variation in structure and experiment, and this is
only to be discussed, by the working class itself,� as they create such
societies.
We can't have the answer before the answer, and we have to build it.
On 02/05/2011 14:24, GERALD LEVY wrote:
>> now back to me: i take it that the discussion is really centering on
>> the third of these ideas. however, i just do not understand the use of
>> the noun, socialism, here. there is nothing socialist about china: the
>> state is operating as a capitalist. like any capitalist, it has
>> various uses for the surplus that its capitalist production generates:
>> some is expended, some is accumulated. and like any capitalist, it
>> seeks to use (other arms of) the state to advance its own interests:
>> eg, infrastructure-building stimulus packages. i know that the term
>> 'market socialism' is still used by the leadership, but that's
>> placating the masses (especially those older folk who thought that on
>> balance mao was pretty good for ordinary people).
>
>
> Michael W:
>
> Thanks for your clarifications via 'Wikipedia' of the different meanings of
> market socialism.
>
> In so far as China is concerned, I was specifically referring to the
> Deng Xiaoping 'socialist market economy' experience - which had a lot of
> similarities to the Right Opposition's proposals in the
> industrialization debates in the USSR in the late 1920s (which were
> advanced by Bukharin) and the proposals to restructure the Soviet
> economy under Gorbachev (perestroika). One could similarly identify
> similarities - and differences, of course - between what happened in
> China under Deng and the Lange-Kalecki conception of market socialism
> and the experiences with market socialism in Hungary under the NEM, the
> former Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and other Eastern European nations
> (especially those which were part of COMECON). [NB: AS I explicitly noted
> in the last sentence, there are similarities *and differences* in these
> experiences: e.g. there was workers' control of enterprises in Yugoslavia
> under Tito whereas the managers who directed enterprises in the NEM in
> Hungary were state-appointed. Some of the institutions and their role in
> China, such as the influence of the PLA, were also distinct.]
>
> In� solidarity, Jerry
>
>> That's why I originally in this thread raised the subject in terms of
>> economic history (including the experience of market socialism in
>> the former Yugoslavia, China under Deng Xiaoping, Hungary
>> under the NEM beginning in 1968, etc.).� ��� ��� ��� � ��� ���
> _______________________________________________
> ope mailing list
> ope@lists.csuchico.edu
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
>
>
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue May 3 01:35:25 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 31 2011 - 00:00:02 EDT