[OPE-L:312] Re: INTERIM PROPOSAL [951021]

Paul Cockshott (wpc@clyder.gn.apc.org)
Sun, 22 Oct 1995 04:38:22 -0700

[ show plain text ]

My objection to discussing Marx's order of inquiry, is that
we do not know what it was. What we have is is order of
presentation + plus various drafts of varying dates. Whether
these can be used to reconstruct his order of inquiry is
an open, and to my mind rather tedious question.