>From [OPE-L:668]
> Jerry
> -----
> (2) Was this an OPE-L "original" or is it based on a published paper that
> you have written, Andrew?
> (3) Does the lack of commentary by others suggest that we all agree that
> the Okishio Theorem is not valid?
> Paul C
> ------
> I had thought that these points were now pretty generally understood.
===========================================================================
Paul, I think you can do better than the above in answering Andrew. Do
you really believe that Andrew's critique of the Okishio Theorem is "now
pretty generally understood"? What is your understanding of that critique
and do you accept it? If not, please explain.
In OPE-L Solidarity,
Jerry