I plan to offer a considered and low-rhetoric response to Andrew's latest
series of postings in a day or two, but in the meantime I can't resist this:
> In his own way, Gil has just conceded that I did indeed demonstrate the
> consistency of the TSS interpretation with Marx's statements that a
> commodity's value is determined by the labor-time required for its
> production, and by the labor contained in it.
Symptomatic of Andrew's intepretive style! Gil's "own way" of conceding
the proposition in question was to argue himself blue in the face to the
contrary. (And though I don't agree with Gil on all matters, I'm with
him all the way on this one.)
Allin.