Amendment to last posting:
For "The proposition I was objecting to was ... that Marx's
_definition of value_ (labour-time required to produce a commodity) somehow
_builds in_ the assumption of p-v equivalence..."
Please read "The proposition I was objecting to was that the standard
interpretation of Marx's _definition of value_ (labour-time required to
produce a commodity) somehow _builds in_ the assumption of p-v
equivalence..."
This may avert unnecessary contention.
Allin.